Understanding ADHD: From Past to Present
- Stella Ong
- May 4
- 6 min read
Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) represents one of the most significant conditions in modern clinical practice. The transformation in diagnosis and treatment approaches over decades reflects substantial advances in neuroscience and assessment methodology. This progression from behavioural observations to comprehensive frameworks has fundamentally changed outcomes for affected individuals and provides crucial insights for current practitioners.
What is ADHD?
Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is one of the most common behavioural conditions and the second most prevalent chronic illness affecting children. Contemporary epidemiological data indicates that ADHD affects approximately 7.2% of children worldwide, while occurring in approximately 2.5% of adults according to cross-national meta-analyses. Higher prevalence rates are consistently observed in specific populations, such as foster children and correctional settings, suggesting complex interactions between biological vulnerabilities and environmental factors.
ADHD manifests through persistent patterns of inattention, hyperactivity, and impulsivity that interfere with functioning and development. These symptoms often result in significant impairments across multiple domains including academic achievement, occupational performance, and social relationships.
The condition frequently persists into adulthood, though symptom presentation may change over the lifespan, with hyperactivity often becoming less obvious while cognitive challenges such as executive function deficits may become more pronounced.
The Journey to Modern ADHD Understanding
The symptoms we now recognize as ADHD have been observed for over a century. In 1902, Dr. George Still described children with behaviours resembling today's ADHD diagnosis, noting patterns of restlessness, inattention, and heightened arousal behaviours in his presentations to the Royal College of Physicians.
However, our clinical understanding has progressed substantially through several key phases:
The Early Classifications
The first edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-I) in 1952 did not include a specific category for ADHD or distinct classifications for children and adolescents. By the 1960s, the DSM-II adopted the term "hyperkinetic reaction of childhood," emphasizing hyperactivity as the primary diagnostic feature with limited attention to cognitive aspects. This early conceptualization provided no specific criteria, cut-offs, or age of onset parameters, reflecting the limited understanding of the condition's neurological underpinnings.
The Attention Revolution
The DSM-III in 1980 represented a revolutionary change with the introduction of attention deficit disorder (ADD) with or without hyperactivity. This significant revision established specific diagnostic criteria requiring a combination of observations: three of five symptoms of inattention, three of six for impulsivity, and two of five for hyperactivity. This shift acknowledged that attention deficits, not just hyperactivity, constituted core features of the disorder.
The DSM-III-R (1987) further refined the diagnostic framework by renaming the condition attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and consolidating symptoms into a single list of 14 items, requiring eight criteria for diagnosis. This consolidation reflected growing recognition of the condition's complex symptomatic presentation.
Current Diagnostic Framework
Our current approach in the DSM-5-TR recognizes ADHD as having three primary presentations:
Predominantly inattentive
Predominantly hyperactive-impulsive
Combined presentation
These are several diagnostic criteria from the current DSM-5-TR:
For children (under 17): At least 6 signs of inattention that persist for 6+ months, AND/OR at least 6 signs of hyperactivity-impulsivity that persist for 6+ months
For Adults (17+): At least 5 signs of inattention that persist for 6+ months, AND/OR at least 5 signs of hyperactivity-impulsivity that persist for 6+ months
Requirement for symptoms to onset before age 12, manifesting in at least 2 settings (home, work, school)
Signs must be inconsistent with developmental level
Symptoms clearly interfere with functioning
How Is ADHD Diagnosed Today?
Modern diagnosis involves a comprehensive multi-method assessment protocol that extends well beyond symptom checklists:
Comprehensive Clinical Evaluation
The contemporary diagnostic approach requires gathering detailed information about behavioural patterns and functional impairment across different settings throughout development. This includes:
Developmental trajectory analysis: Examining prenatal, perinatal, and early childhood factors that may contribute to symptom development
Thorough family history assessment: Identifying potential genetic contributions, as ADHD shows significant heritability
Educational performance review: Analysing academic achievement patterns, classroom behaviour reports, and learning challenges
Environmental assessment: Evaluating home, school, and social environments for factors that may exacerbate or mitigate symptoms
Multi-Informant Assessment
Contemporary best practice requires collecting behavioural ratings and observations from multiple informants who observe the individual across different contexts:
|  |
This cross-contextual approach helps ensure that symptoms reflect consistent patterns rather than context-specific behaviours that might be better explained by environmental factors or other conditions.
Functional Impact Evaluation
Current diagnostic standards stipulate that symptoms must disrupt or reduce the quality of social, academic, or occupational functioning. This functional impairment criterion distinguishes ADHD from normative variations in attention and activity level. Assessment typically involves:
Structured interviews about daily functioning
Rating scales measuring impairment across life domains
Performance-based measures of executive function
Academic and/or occupational performance data
It's important to note that while computerized tests of attention and impulsivity may complement the diagnostic process, the DSM-5-TR explicitly states that no biological marker is currently diagnostic for ADHD. Diagnosis remains fundamentally clinical, based on observed patterns of behaviour and reported functional challenges.
Treatment Evolution: Moving Beyond Medication Alone
The treatment of ADHD has transformed significantly since its early clinical recognition, now encompassing a sophisticated multimodal approach:
Pharmacological Interventions
Medication treatments for ADHD have a long history, dating back to Bradley’s 1937 report that Benzedrine improved behaviour in hospitalized children. The pharmacological approach has evolved considerably, with the development of extended-release formulations representing a significant advancement that has improved treatment adherence and provided more consistent symptom control throughout the day.
Despite their demonstrated efficacy, research indicates that a significant proportion of adults may be unsuitable for medication, and even among responders, symptom reduction may be modest. This limitation has driven interest in complementary approaches.
Psychosocial Interventions
Contemporary treatment increasingly emphasizes behavioural and psychological interventions:
Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT): Particularly effective in adult ADHD, CBT typically includes psychoeducation, cognitive restructuring, and skills training aimed at changing maladaptive cognitions and behaviours while reducing psychological distress
Parent Training: Evidence-based programs teaching parents behavioural management strategies and improving parent-child interactions
School-Based Interventions: Classroom management techniques, academic accommodations, and teacher training programs designed to optimize educational outcomes
Skills Development: Structured approaches to building executive function, organizational skills, time management, and social competence
The Integrated Approach
Modern best practice emphasizes individualized, multi-modal treatment plans that address both core symptoms and functional challenges across settings. However, recent critical perspectives have highlighted the need to re-evaluate the dominant biomedical narrative surrounding ADHD. These perspectives argue for more balanced approaches that:
Consider developmental, psychological, and social factors alongside neurobiological mechanisms
Emphasize building on strengths rather than merely addressing deficits
Recognize neurodiversity while still addressing functional challenges
Tailor interventions to individual profiles rather than applying standardized protocols
This shift toward more nuanced, personalized treatment planning recognizes that achieving optimal outcomes requires addressing both primary symptoms and secondary functional challenges across multiple life domains and throughout development.
Moving Forward: A Balanced Perspective
In my practice, I’ve found that the most successful outcomes occur when we:
Address core symptoms with appropriate medical support when needed
Develop practical skills for managing daily challenges
Create supportive environments that accommodate different thinking and working styles
Build on individual strengths rather than focusing solely on challenges
For individuals and families navigating ADHD, evidence-based clinical support remains essential. Current approaches offer more sophisticated assessment protocols and intervention options than ever before, allowing for truly personalized treatment planning that addresses the unique challenges and strengths each person presents.
Need ADHD Counselling & Support in East Singapore?
If you or someone you love is navigating ADHD, effective clinical support is available right here. Our evidence-based ADHD counselling services combine contemporary therapeutic techniques with personalised treatment plans to provide you practical strategies for symptom management and improved functioning.
Conveniently located in the East side of Singapore near Eunos and Joo Chiat, we offer affordable ADHD therapy with quick appointment scheduling (often within 1-2 days). The journey to understanding and managing ADHD continues to evolve, and today’s approaches offer more hope and practical solutions than ever before.
References
American Psychiatric Association. (2022). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed., text rev.). American Psychiatric Association Publishing.
Carlew, A., & Zartman, A. (2016). DSM nosology changes in neuropsychological diagnoses through the years: A look at ADHD and mild neurocognitive disorder. Behavioral Sciences, 7(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs7010001
Mallett, C. A., Natarajan, A., & Hoy, J. (2014). Attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A DSM timeline review. International Journal of Mental Health, 43(4), 36–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207411.2015.1009310
Mucci, F., Carpita, B., Pagni, G., Vecchia, A. D., Bjedov, S., Pozza, A., & Marazziti, D. (2021). Lifetime evolution of ADHD treatment. Journal of Neural Transmission, 128(7), 1085–1098. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00702-021-02336-w
Ophir, Y. (2024). Reevaluating ADHD and its first-line treatment: Insights from DSM-5-TR and modern approaches. Clinical Neuropsychiatry, 21(5), 436–443. https://doi.org/10.36131/cnfioritieditore20240507
Wolraich, M. L., Chan, E., Froehlich, T., Lynch, R. L., Bax, A., Redwine, S. T., Ihyembe, D., & Hagan, J. F. (2019). ADHD diagnosis and treatment guidelines: A historical perspective. Pediatrics, 144(4), 75–83. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2019-1682
Young, Z., Moghaddam, N., & Tickle, A. (2016). The efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy for adults with ADHD: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Attention Disorders, 24(6), 875–888. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087054716664413
留言